Category Archives: OiNK Media Coverage

OiNK Media Coverage

PRESS-iNG PORK: OiNK’S PRESS CLiPPiNGS

1 Comment

Throughout OiNK’s run Uncle Pigg liked to show off how well received his comic was with the public (and even on one occasion how badly received it was, but more on that later in the year). As well as the kids telling him how awesome he was, he’d print newspaper and magazine articles that highlighted his piggy publication. The cover of one issue was even devoted to quotes like some kind of blockbuster movie.

For this post I’ve collected together all of the press clippings from throughout the run, beginning with #22. This was in the pre-internet days when a comic had to be on the shelf for a while to get noticed, then by the time the piece about OiNK was written, printed, noticed by the comic and then reprinted there (and remembering publishers work issues ahead at a time) it was months before they starting showing up on the Grunts page.

“A global platform for emerging talent in fashion, music, art and culture”, back in the 80s i-D obviously weren’t too happy with the amount of licenced comics on the shelves, but they took the time to highlight original publications for the kids and ours was included. This fleeting mention was just the beginning of OiNK’s impact with the British press, the next example being just three issues later in #25.

Obviously The Guardian needs no introduction and this clipping comes via another Irish reader. Again, it’s a brief mention but comics rarely got any positive light in the press at the time, so any mention at all was a big win. Then below, by #37 Fleetway Publications may have just taken over the printing of the comic but they were more than happy to share the feedback about what had been IPC Magazines’ OiNK.

The Sunday Times piece was the first we’d hear about W.H. Smith’s stupid decision (although a previous newsagent reservation coupon did allude to it), and the so-called ‘reason’ behind this will be the topic of a blog post in a few months. ‘Zzap!’ is actually Zzap! 64, the Commodore 64 computer gaming magazine and you can read the full article, which was a preview of the OiNK game in a post already up on the blog.

According to OiNK’s co-editor Patrick Gallagher, Mary Whitehouse was aware of OiNK and its spoof portrayal of her, and her team were watching the comic closely for libel although no action was ever taken. The image of Mary Lighthouse used by the News on Sunday is a perfect caricature of the conservative activist, almost like they chose the image that most closely resembled her!

The celebratory 50th issue had two clippings to show off the comic’s growing status in the press and it describes OiNK as a “new fortnightly”, although it does mention the change to weekly. Obviously 40-odd issues of a fortnightly was still deemed ‘new’. OiNK should’ve still been in the early years of its life, reminding us of how the comic was ultimately robbed! We’ll return to that Sunday Times piece further down this post.

The second clipping from #50 is from none other than NME (New Musical Express), and only in describing OiNK could “snot nosed cousin” be seen as a compliment. The magazine obviously focussed on OiNK’s musical parodies and when you see them all written out like this you realise just how many there had been! You can check out The Mekons on the blog in their photo story in #29 and the Ian Astbury interview with Janice Pong (in reality Tony Husband) in #16’s review.

In #52 a clipping from Escape magazine saw OiNK listed in their Hip Parade where readers voted on their favourite publications, and it included a little sample of the Uncle Pigg and Mary Lighthouse strips we loved so much during the comic’s fortnightly days. This won’t be the last we see of Escape’s chart either. But first, I mentioned a blockbuster movie-like cover, didn’t I?

For #54 OiNK gave us just a sample of all of the press coverage it had been gathering. Working our way down this impressive list, the Fantasy Advertiser quote came from an article written by Lew Stringer marking OiNK’s release, we’ve seen The Sunday Times and The Guardian already and as for The Press Council (of all people!) just keep an eye on the blog for that one (which I’ve already hinted at a couple of times in this post).

Sounds was a music newspaper along the lines of NME but sadly we never got to see the actual article this quote was taken from, and I love what the comic has decided to highlight from NME’s piece. How very OiNK! The News on Sunday obviously hadn’t made it far beyond its OiNK article in #37 above, and Escape brings up the rear.

Moving on to the monthlies we now find ourselves with the first of the bumper issues, #63. Relaunched for a new target audience, a plethora of press clippings were included on the Grunts page (or OiNK’s Piggin’ Crazy Readers as it was now known) with the tagline “New readers start here”.

Mainly they’re different bits of the articles we’ve seen already, however it’s nice to see more of that Sunday Times piece that was unceremoniously cut off in #50 just as it started talking about the eco-message in Jeremy Banx’s Burp strips. At the bottom you’ll see a clipping from The Sunday World, a tabloid rag available this side of the Irish Sea that likes to preach morality while sowing lies, hatred and division. So kudos to OiNK for proudly proclaiming how it reported on the comic’s existence.

Oh, and if you’re interested in the issue they’re criticising it’s #47, which was on sale at the same time as OiNK’s Smokebuster Special was distributed free to schools in England, but that would be seen as a positive so obviously the tabloid wouldn’t mention it. You can see the OiNK calendar with the offending football match and as for the “walrus with an alien coming out of its mouth”? Really, Sunday World? That would be horrible! It’s actually Burp the Smelly Alien’s sentient stomach spitting out a live oyster. Get it right! (Just goes to show you how closely these critics paid attention to what they were criticising.)

The final press clipping is from #64 and it updates us on OiNK’s standing with the readers of Escape magazine, whose votes saw our piggy pink publication skyrocket from 28th position to 17th since just three photos ago. From everything included throughout this post OiNK seemed destined to last and last, to soar ever higher in Escape’s charts and give us many more years of prime pork.

Unfortunately, just four issues later it would all come to an end. But OiNK’s legacy is still intact. It’s a legacy which some lesser informed commentators dismiss as one that caused complaints and controversy, but as you can see the reality was very different and so much better!

OiNK MEDiA COVERAGE MENU

MAiN OiNK MENU

Christmas, OiNK Media Coverage

SPEAKEASY #81: A CHAT WiTH MARK RODGERS

Leave a comment

Just five short months after the previous issue of Speakeasy that featured on the blog came their Christmas issue, complete with snow and holly on the title (as it should be) and our piggy publication got a headline mention too. That’s because inside there was a massive double-page spread all about our favourite comic.

OiNK featured in the earlier issue in a much smaller way. Here, an unknown writer (no credit is given so it could be anyone out of Cefn Ridout, Dick Hansom, Bambos Georgiou and Nigel Curson) chats to OiNK co-creator/co-editor Mark Rodgers and the big news was that OiNK was finally going weekly with #45!

I remember the first time this was announced in the comic and I was absolutely thrilled. The loss of some key characters to a semi-regular basis and a reduction in pages was a bit of a shock though. If I’d been reading Speakeasy I’d have had a heads up and Mark’s explanation about some characters being on a regular rotation makes perfect sense. If only the comic itself had told us this at the time, maybe more readers would’ve stayed around.

There are a handful of previews for the new weekly strips here, showcasing Lew Stringer’s main characters who would now always have full pages to themselves. David Haldane’s are shown in their entirety and Billy Brown’s Black Hole was a one-off but even on such a smaller scale Simon Thorp’s detailed artwork still looks the part. Two-thirds of it are shown here even though we wouldn’t see it in OiNK until #68, the final issue!

“The pigs started taking over. We eventually decided to call it OiNK.”

Mark Rodgers

The piece begins with the well-known tale of how OiNK’s three creators (Mark, Tony Husband and Patrick Gallagher) met and, once we get to the point in the story where OiNK received its name, the writer takes every opportunity to insert a surprisingly well-crafted pig pun. The article focusses on OiNK’s independence and what set it apart from its contemporaries. Most interestingly, Mark likens OiNK to its stablemates when they were younger comics, when they pushed the envelope with their own rebellious senses of humour.

But by the 80s what was once rebellious had become stagnant. OiNK was their attempt at rekindling that same feeling for the modern audience. I’ve no doubt those that complained about OiNK failed to see the similarity to the comics from their own youth. Other interesting tidbits here include Mark admitting the humour was going to be gently changed to appeal to the middle-ground of their readers’ ages, Burp is misspelled throughout for some reason, and the DallasEnders photo strip mentioned wouldn’t actually see the light of day until #63, the first monthly.

“It’s going back to the basics of children’s humour comics really.”

Mark Rodgers

Lew Stringer also pops up towards the end when he’s asked about his involvement with the weekly relaunch. To help with the quicker turnover of issues Lew was asked to design half a dozen of the covers, three of which he would draw himself and the rest would be handed over to others. Lew discusses the idea behind them and it’s interesting that he came up with a theme for them in response to the fact the issues themselves would no longer be themed. Clever.

There’s one point here that’s particularly relevant. Mark talks about some of the more popular characters and how readers could identify with them. They were highly exaggerated versions of us and our likes, dislikes and behaviours of course, but it meant we could laugh at ourselves alongside the celebrity spoofs and random characters inside the comic. In a world where certain corners of the internet bemoan comics (and other mediums) wanting to create identifiable characters for modern audiences, it’s clear they don’t know their own comics history. It’s always been a thing, whether in superhero comics or silly ones about pigs and plops.

It’s time for a quick look at some other little bits that caught my eye as I read this edition of Speakeasy. Some things never change, as some got into a tizzy over new Bible-based comics. They were reported on as “obscene” and “degrading”, created by “perverts who should be prosecuted”. Reported as such in a tabloid that had topless women every day and another that constantly runs bikini photographs of celebrities the second they are of legal age.

A paragraph about the atrocious ratings of a Marvel TV series ends with the first news of one of my favourite shows of all time, the 80’s War of the Worlds. Well, the first season was ace and ahead of its time, a superb sequel to the 1953 movie and which had a clear multi-year arc long before Babylon 5. But then the studio began interfering. When they didn’t get their way they fired show runner Greg Strangis, relaunching it with a completely different season two which was lame, contradicted everything that had come before and killed off any non-white characters (but I’m sure that was just a coincidence, right?). Am I still bitter all these years later? You betcha.

Marvel UK’s licenced comics get an update (the update for Fleetway would have you believe they only published 2000AD), however there’s no word on those Action Force issues being the last. Then there’s a rather familiar name associated with an anti-smoking campaign and I for one would be happy to be incorrectly identified as that person. Finally, Pat Mills and Hunt Emerson brought us a role-playing game book that just might have a point behind it. It’s subtle.

That brings us to the end of another look at Speakeasy, a time capsule for the comics scene of the 80s. I know it was publisher Fleetway’s idea to turn OiNK into a weekly but Mark seems genuinely enthusiastic for its potential. It’s always enjoyable to read about his love of the comic, it’s so infectious. Christmas 1987 was such an exciting time for pig pals, with the very best issues of OiNK the team produced, the first OiNK Book and news of the weeklies to come.

Very happy memories indeed and you can relive them (or discover them for the first time) in the OiNK Real-Time Read Through. Enjoy!

GO TO SPEAKEASY 76

OiNK MEDiA COVERAGE

MAiN OiNK MENU

CHRiSTMAS 2024

OiNK Media Coverage

SPEAKEASY #76: ‘PAPER PRESS PiGS

Leave a comment

This is #76 of Speakeasy, a sort of newspaper about the UK comics industry which began life as a fanzine in 1979 and would go on to become a monthly resource for comics fans and the industry for over 120 issues, all the way through to 1991. Above is the front cover as it would’ve been seen on the shelves, fitting in perfectly with all of the other similarly-sized UK comics. However, that wasn’t its true front page.

I think this was rather neat! It opens out to tabloid size and is printed on similar newspaper stock. With 20 of these huge pages there was certainly plenty to read in the days when we relied on print publications to deliver us our comics news. Bambos Georgiou, who drew Blimey! It’s Slimer in The Real Ghostbusters (after Lew Stringer’s early issues) was editor at one stage, although by now that job was Richard Ashford‘s.

Bambos is credited as the ‘UK Correspondent’ but in reality publishers Acme Press Ltd was the creation of his, Richard, Cefn Ridout and Dick Hansom, who readers of the blog may know better as the editor of Dark Horse International’s Jurassic Park and Aliens comics. The connections with other blog comics continues as Death’s Head/Dragon’s Claws/The Sleeze Brothers editor (and friend of the blog) Richard Starkings designed the logo.

It’s a meaty read and there’s a lot packed onto each page but I did spot this blink-and-you’ll-miss-it reference to Visionaries, although it’s short on details. This issue of Speakeasy went on sale on this date back in 1987 and the American Visionaries comic would launch as a bi-monthly in November, not coming over to this side of The Pond until Spring 1988. Also, the less said about that He-Man movie the better, yes? I still shudder with the memory of the one night I watched it back then!

So anyway, why am I showing you this issue of Speakeasy? Simple, it’s because OiNK gets a mention. This shouldn’t really be surprising news when you spot a page summing up a lot of that month’s releases, however there’s more to it than that as far as OiNK is concerned. It mentions the banning of the comic from the kids’ shelves in W.H. Smith (boo!) and the surprising revelation to me that John Menzies didn’t stock it at all!

I remember visiting a John Menzies in Oban in Scotland as a teen, when we spent summers in a small village in the highlands of Scotland, and I’d spend my hard-earned waiting staff wages on games for my Commodore 64 that was waiting for me back home in Northern Ireland. If I’d known, I’d have went elsewhere. However, as you can see the column here says they were only losing OiNK about 10,000 sales per issue. Yes, it’s not to be sniffed at when you’re the publisher, but when OiNK was selling 100,000 and more per issue I honestly thought the figure would’ve been higher.

I do like the fact Speakeasy calls for its readers to do the complaining now and gives us the address to write to one of the newsagents in question. “Bring Back the Bacon to Where It Belongs!!” Love it! You can check out the reviews for the two issues mentioned here, #34 and #35 on the blog. No mention though of how these two issues saw the transition between original publisher IPC Magazines and Fleetway Publications.

This full-page advertisement for that year’s UK Comic Art Convention stood out to me as well thanks to a couple of photographs I’d already seen that were taken at this very event. You’ll see Tom Thug and Pete and his Pimple cartoonist Lew Stringer’s name on the page as a confirmed guest, alongside OiNK contributors Kevin O’Neill and Dave Gibbons and several of the talented creative team from Marvel UK’s Transformers.

Not mentioned are more of Uncle Pigg’s finest workers who all appeared at an OiNK panel during the weekend. Below are two photographs kindly supplied by Lew showing the team taking questions from the audience with their 80s hair dos in all their glory (and Lew rocking the OiNK t-shirt).

In the first photo (from left to right) we have the panel’s moderator Theo Clark, then Lew himself, Ed McHenry (“swigging pop” according to Lew), David Leach, Davy Francis hidden behind him and Jeremy Banx! In the second photo you can see Ed more clearly and on the far left is Viz co-creator Chris Donald. OiNK was at the height of its popularity at this point, (despite the best efforts of the aforementioned newsagents) having just enjoyed its first anniversary, the release of its first Holiday Special, the first annual was in the can and some of the comic’s best issues were about to hit the shelves.

Also of note to blog readers (and readers of its social media) is a little bit about Transformers and Action Force (G.I. Joe), namely Dave Gibbons drawing the cover to #133 of the former which is worthy of a mention in the news and there’s also a preview of his art. Action Force gets more space here with the announcement of a monthly comic to compliment the weekly, for sale both in the UK and as a way of repackaging British stories into a smaller comic to sell in the States.

The thing is, while it states here that this new comic would be released in a few months, Action Force Monthly wouldn’t appear until the following summer after the weekly had already been cancelled and merged with Transformers. It’s interesting to see it wasn’t originally planned as a replacement for the cancelled weekly but instead fans of Duke, Snake Eyes and Scarlett were meant to have both a weekly and a monthly to enjoy every month.

OiNK may have only got a small mention here but I’m always on the look out for my favourite comic of all time popping up in media of the day. It was nice to see it being taken seriously in the pages of Speakeasy and the call for support to get it back among the children’s comics. Speakeasy itself is a fascinating snapshot of the medium in the 80s and if you’re a fan of the decade’s comics you could do worse than picking up a few issues to see how your favourites were reported on.

GO TO SPEAKEASY 81

OiNK MEDiA COVERAGE

MAiN OiNK MENU

OiNK Media Coverage

OiNK! iN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS!

Leave a comment

These two issues of OiNK were linked by a somewhat famous incident in the life of the comic when #64 published what was initially just another funny page. However, it resulted in a follow up in #67 when it became the topic of conversation in a rather important place in the UK. I don’t think many of our comics have the honour of being a search result on the government’s website, but that’s certainly the case with OiNK. Let’s start at the beginning.

Back in the review for #64 I highlighted writer Howard Osborn‘s Ten Things You Need to Know About the New Poll Tax, retooled as a way of taxing parrot owners across Great Britain, which made about as much sense as the real thing. It was a hilarious piece of satire at a time when Margaret Thatcher’s Poll Tax on the mainland (it never made it over here to Northern Ireland) was getting ridiculed across the media, from the news to Spitting Image. Now a children’s comic was having a go too.

As I said in the review certain points of this feel very prescient, which is actually something I’ve noticed in a lot of OiNK’s more satirical jokes recently. The Poll Tax itself was so universally hated I can remember it being on the news constantly, even though I never paid attention to such things at a young age. The aforementioned latex puppets probably helped in that regard.

Fast-forward three months and #67 had the blurb, “As read in the House of Commons!” emblazoned on the cover. Inside, Uncle Pigg announced that a young pig pal by the name of William Pickering had reached out to local Labour MP Jeff Rooker, who the comic describes as William’s “pal” and showed him OiNK’s piece, for which Howard finally received the writing credit. Uncle Pigg thought readers might like to know his fine publication was then spoken about (and even quoted) in the corridors of power.

It’s quite funny to think this happened at the time, our little comic being referred to by the government and not in a critical way like some late Northern Ireland politicians who had wanted it banned. Instead the rebellious, anarchic OiNK was being held up by a government official, albeit as an example of the contempt felt by the populace for the party in power. But that’s not the end of this particular story.

OiNK had proved its point beyond its wildest dreams

The text is from Hansard, the official record of the UK parliament. “From what I remember, Hansard made contact with us and informed us,” OiNK co-editor Patrick Gallagher told me. “It’s what we pay our taxes for, particularly Poll Tax in this case.” Just for the blog, Patrick reached out to Uncle Pigg on his tropical retirement island for comment, who snorted, “The impression I got was that they [Hansard] were a fan. Don’t forget, we also made an excellent impression on Edwina Curry so we were well respected and talked about in certain quarters of the government, too.” Indeed, here’s a photo from the Smokebuster Special promotion to prove his point.

The parliamentary records are much more accessible today thanks to the Internet and a quick search for ‘OiNK’ in the year 1988 brings up the full session from that day. This includes the complete exchange between Rooker and fellow MP Patrick McLoughlin who, in typical Conservative fashion, completely ignores the point of why the comic was quoted in the first place.

OiNK’s inclusion by Rooker was to show how the tax was so widely unpopular that even children were mocking it. Rooker also clearly explained he didn’t read comics and that a young child of a constituent had pointed it out to him. Despite all of this, the Tory member accuses Rooker of having nothing better to do than read comics, which just showed everyone McLoughlin had no good response to OiNK’s ribbing. He really should’ve just stayed seated and quiet.

So there you go, the day OiNK was read out in the House of Commons. If you’d like to see it on the government’s website for yourself you can check it out at this link, although the screenshot above is all there is on OiNK. I loved the original piece by Howard and seeing the ruling party’s pathetic response just makes it all the funnier. OiNK had proved its point beyond its wildest dreams.

OiNK MEDiA COVERAGE MENU

MAiN OiNK MENU

OiNK Media Coverage, OiNK Merchandise

CRASH #42: A SPECTRUM OF PiGGY PiNK

Leave a comment

In 1987 “The Mag That Saves Your Bacon”, Sinclair ZX Spectrum computing magazine Crash (which ran for 98 issues between 1984 and 1992) approached IPC Magazines about interviewing the OiNK editors regarding the comic for a special preview of the forthcoming computer game. During these conversations the idea of producing a special edition of the comic to give away inside Crash came up. Co-creator/co-editor Patrick Gallagher told me the magazine’s publishers Newsfield were receptive to the idea, very open-minded about what it could contain and paid the OiNK team to produce it. That issue of Crash went on sale today 35 years ago.

So, with a special feature and an extra edition of my favourite comic of all time I just had to track this down on eBay. This is the only issue of Crash I’ve ever read. I found myself reading more than just the OiNK related pages too and have included some highlights I found particularly interesting below. First up though is the interview and a special page from Frank Sidebottom. The comic itself I’ll keep for a review post of its own, which you’ll be able to read in a few days. So what exactly would an issue of Crash involve? Here’s the contents page, with a little guest appearance from a certain explosive personality.

What it means by “it’s not really page 59″ is the fact the free comic was in the centre of the issue so if you opened at page 59 it would plop out. The title of the interview is another reference to George Orwell‘s Animal Farm, which OiNK parodied in #30, on sale at the same time coincidentally enough. In the editorial Roger Kean kicks things off by pointing out the free comic and the article, noting this is the first time they’ve ever teamed up with another publication.

Graeme Kidd‘s article is longer and more in-depth than the one featured in Zzap!64 the month before. While the Zzap preview had told the origin story of OiNK, Crash spoke with Tony Husband directly and there’s some wonderful pieces of information for pig pals. Zzap mentioned the initial idea had been for a fanzine, here Tony is able to elaborate on the reasons behind that. The initial chance meeting in a local library between Patrick and Mark Rodgers (both working on Whizzer and Chips without knowing each other) is also mentioned, a tale I’ve heard before briefly but again there’s more detail here.

“It’s a success story the comic’s creators hardly dreamed of.”

Graeme Kidd, Four Legs Good

There are some little factoids for fans such as OiNK’s sales, the dummy issue being met with a divided opinion at IPC Magazines but ultimately championed by the people who would make the call (Youth Group Managing Director John Sanders and ‘John Painter’ is an error, that should be Bob Paynter Group Editor of Humour Comics), the original strategy in its creation and how the idea of putting together a small, weekly comic was changed to a larger, fortnightly one. Of course, that weekly format is the one OiNK would eventually turn into (much to the annoyance of some).

There’s a funny moment when we find out a certain comics publisher wasn’t too happy with OiNK spoofs of their characters (one example mentioned can be seen in #18‘s review) and a horrific episode for a young reader whose mum showed just how hypocritical those who think they’re morally superior to others can really be (like certain scaremongering tabloids). At the end there’s a very quick preview of the game which, after painting a fascinating picture of the comic, shows us probably the most uninspired screenshot possible.

To see the original Janice & John strip Tony mentions check out #7‘s review and for OiNK’s response to the complaint make sure to read #28‘s!

Over the page from this piggy pink spread we get a little something extra from Frank Sidebottom in the shape of a guide to computers, which is really a competition page with rather wonderful prizes. If I’d known Crash had a free issue of OiNK and the chance to win original artwork, t-shirts, mugs etc. I’d have been all over this as a child, even if I wouldn’t own my own computer for another four years.

I must add a little caveat here. This doesn’t look like Frank’s usual handwriting and it’s been signed “Topbottom”. I initially thought he’d been in a rush to complete it for Crash’s deadline and that was the reason for the change in style slightly, but some fans believed it wasn’t his work when I initially shared this post on social media. I checked with Patrick who can’t remember if that was the case, but he’s certain Chris (Sievey, the man behind the mask) wouldn’t have knowingly let anyone else do it, especially if it meant copying his OiNK work. So I’m going to say it was him.

Just wait and see Frank’s contribution to the OiNK pullout comic, it’s proof indeed of just how much he’d put into his work for kids.

So that’s OiNK’s contribution to the magazine itself and strangely enough I can’t find evidence of the all-important game review in any following issue. Does this not bode well for the quality of the finished product? No, even if the game had been absolute trash the magazines of the time would’ve reviewed it and given it an appropriate score. But from my extensive research into the rest of that year’s issues (and those from 1988 as well) it just wasn’t reviewed by Crash. However, Zzap!64 did so watch out for that soon.

The debut of the brand new 007,
Timothy Dalton!

Back to Crash and as I said the free comic will be getting its own review post (as well it should) but I wanted to highlight two particular features in the magazine that stood out for me personally in this delightfully retro read. I’m a big fan of both James Bond and Nintendo, so first up was news of not only the next Bond computer game but also the brand new movie it was based on, The Living Daylights and the debut of a brand new 007 which is always an exciting occasion.

That actor of course was Timothy Dalton, who is still my favourite in the role to this day. His second movie, Licence To Kill is not only the best Bond film in my opinion it’s also my second favourite movie of all time (behind only Jaws, in case you were wondering). Unfortunately, with MGM going bankrupt a year or so later the movies paused until the mid-90s and by that stage Dalton wanted to move on. But The Living Daylights is a superb film and here Curtis Hutchinson took a look at its stunt work. Special mention must also go to that gorgeous Oliver Frey cover above! That would’ve made for an excellent poster but alas it was only ever to be found in A4 size and covered with text.

There’s also an advertisement for the game, which like a lot of our gaming adverts back then didn’t include a single screenshot. The Spy Vs Spy game was also a favourite later on when I got my Commodore 64, based upon characters from Mad Magazine, itself one of the influences behind OiNK’s sense of humour and satirical edge.

I do love a good contemporary retro article about new releases in the things I’m interested in. It’s always fascinating to look back at how they were written about at the time. The next thing I want to show you is another such example. As a kid I remember friends getting so incredibly hyped over new Nintendo consoles but I only became a fan later down the road with the Game Boy and GameCube machines. These days I’m fanatical about my Nintendo Switch and so this was a very enjoyable read about “Mattel’s Nintendo”. Mattel helped Nintendo with distribution in the UK but it was wrongly labelled as their machine and simply called “a Nintendo” by many at the time.

What’s lovely and quaint here is how the ZX Spectrum range of computers are compared very favourably to the flashy new Japanese console by Crash’s whole team. Of course this is a Spectrum magazine and so it was always going to be that way. I remember later issues of Commodore Format in the mid-90s comparing the ageing machine (which I still adored and used even then) favourably against the latest gaming tech. Bless. This article in particular is like a snapshot of the industry at the time. Oh, and for those Nintendo fans reading, the news pages carried information on a price cut to the system already but it must’ve been too late to edit the article. The two bundles had been chopped down to £99.99 and £155.00, which was fierce competition for the home computers of the day!

This has been a surprisingly magical trip down memory lane, one I’ve enjoyed immensely. Don’t forget about that Zzap!64 preview of the game and a Retro Gamer article from 2021 has also featured on the blog, containing an interview with the man behind the game. But we’ve not quite finished with this edition of Crash, as the free comic is still here waiting to be seen by blog readers. I’d assume for many it’ll probably be the first time you’ll have seen it too. It’s blog review will be here in a few days. After that the Zzap!64 review of the OiNK computer game itself will reveal how good/bad it turned out, which you’ll be able to read from Saturday 9th July. Later in the year I’ll have some articles from my own teenage favourite, Commodore Format to share later with you too. Plenty to het stuck into then. Bye for now.

THE OiNK! COMPUTER GAME MENU

OiNK MERCHANDiSE MENU

MAiN OiNK MENU