Tag Archives: Roy Thomas

DRACULA #10: VLAD THE SAD

Esteban Maroto’s glorious cover gives the impression of a comic in rude health. Dark Horse International’s usual penchant for almost unreadable headlines hides what sounds like a particularly exciting issue for those that had stayed with Dracula this long after the association with the movie had ended. However, upon opening the issue we’re met with an editorial containing the round up of what’s happened in the main strip (instead of it being given its own page) and a “special message”.

Respect to editor Dick Hansom for telling the readers the truth rather than the next issue not appearing, something many comics in the 90s did, including DHI’s own titles. Although, he says readers can continue to read imported Topps Comics Dracula comics. Having researched these, alongside Vlad the Impaler (which concludes here) I can only find a Dracula Versus Zorro mini-series from the same year. Perhaps cancellation was the preferred option after all.

What Has Gone Before is part of the editorial to make room for the 28 pages of To Rise Again from the usual team of writer Roy Thomas, artist Esteban, colourist Paul Mounts and letterer John Costanza. It begins with Vlad beheading a King’s guard who tried to forcibly remove a thief from Castle Dracula who had begged for sanctuary. The guard insists the thief hadn’t asked permission. However, the guard also hadn’t before placing his foot across the threshold.

The King of Hungary, who had kept Vlad captive up until now, gives him an army to lead against the Turks, hoping Vlad’s viciousness will help him in his dire situation and lead to more impalements across the land. However,  another of the King’s allies, Stephen Bathory wants Transylvania as thanks for his own help and Vlad is left with Wallachia, which he becomes ruler of again after his younger brother, Prince Radu dies of syphilis. 

On a few occasions Vlad’s narration laments his own decisions, defending himself by reminding us he was only human at the time. For example, he didn’t know he had only two months left to live and wishes he’d made better choices, in particular with his family; he’s now married to the King’s cousin, they have two children and are in love as opposed to his previous wife who he’d forced into a relationship.

He realises his enemies (and allies) are amassing against his bloodlust and he takes drastic measures. He orders all of his wealth be amassed before leaving for a secret destination. Even his loyal assistant Cazan is left behind. Vlad shows a surprising amount of love for the man in these moments, telling the reader he was hurting because he’d left his friend with the wrong impression. You see, once all his worldly goods were buried (in an area where he’d dammed a river, then released the water again to hide the burial site) he impaled everyone involved. He didn’t want to have to kill his friend too.

But he would’ve.

Someone claiming their village was destroyed by Vlad’s enemies comes to swear allegiance and, despite Cazan’s vocal suspicions, the man is allowed to join the army in a top advisory role. Vlad admits to the reader he had his own doubts but in a moment of “grim fatalism” he took in “a suspected viper to my bosom”. We’re reaching the end here. In the build up to the final battle against his hated foe, Danesti he’s unsurprisingly betrayed and Cazan takes a knife to the chest as he leaps to Vlad’s defence. Even though Vlad is also killed, his narration continues from beyond the grave and it’s here that the story goes on a tangent from known history. 

Beheaded by the assassin, after the battle is over pious monks take his body to be honoured by the Catholic church, which praises what this monster of a man achieved in the name of Christianity. However, that night the chapel is destroyed by a wild, unforeseen storm. This leads many of the faith to believe he’ll never be allowed to rest in peace because of what he did in life.

That was only his body, though. His head gets its own story. It was taken to Mehmed the Conqueror. However, over the course of just one night it becomes so badly decomposed it’s no longer recognisable to the people who come to see it impaled on a spike. We also find out that Vlad’s illegitimate son, Mihnea became known for terrorising the lands, cutting off the noses and lips of his enemies, with Vlad’s narration full of pride for the next Prince of Wallachia.

We then suddenly jump forward 150 years and a hooded stranger (actually a descendant) arrives at the church where Vlad’s decapitated body is buried; on orders from the Pope it is to be moved because it was buried too close to the altar. There’s a mention of Vlad’s wife’s suicide damning her for all eternity, which should be at least a bit familiar to fans of the film. However, unlike his supposed head a century-and-a-half earlier Vlad’s body hasn’t decayed.

After the spread above, his actual head (which we learn is not decomposed either) is placed on to his body, the stranger recites some ancient texts in a foreign language and Vlad rises again, instantly biting the neck of his descendant, energising his body and beginning his life as a vampire. While the story ends with an image of him declaring himself as the Dracula of Bram Stoker’s creation this origin story, even the resurrection part, is very different from the novel. In fact, it’s only one of a few possible stories about Vlad’s body after he died.

This has been a curious strip. We know that Stoker had very limited knowledge of Vlad the Impaler, that particular part of the world or indeed that point in history and he simply picked at scraps of information to build his character. (Not forgetting his own supposed xenophobia which may have contributed to the story.) This strip seems to dangle somewhere between actual history and the novel. After accurately chronicling the historical character (as much as a comic can), this final chapter commits itself to neither the truth nor Stoker’s imagination.

There’s a lot of ambiguity surrounding the events of his burial so Roy has decided to fill in the gaps as he saw fit, and that’s fair. Personally though, I’d have preferred to have had the mystery remain. It could’ve still ended with how it began four months ago, with Dracula relaying the story to the reader and letting them fill in the blanks. The mystery could’ve added to the spookiness, the unknown adding to the fear instead of it being filled in for us.  Overall though, I’ve really enjoyed it and it’s peaked my interest in the real life man. I’ve found myself reading about him at length because of this comic.

It’s a shame the sales figures dropped so sharply after the adaptation finished, although I’m not sure what they could’ve printed anyway. This last issue also sees Vampirella unceremoniously dumped (she never did get her own cover as promised) and the small back up strip is rather unremarkable. But I wanted to concentrate on the main story anyway.

Overall this has been a quality comic and a pleasant surprise from start-to-finish. From a brilliantly realised movie adaptation to a fascinating look at the man behind the myth. From an initially clichéd Vampirella origin to a captivating story and character I’d never read before. From interesting news on the film’s release to a series of remarkable anthology back up strips. I didn’t expect too much from what was essentially a movie tie-in, but Dark Horse International’s Dracula has been a great read from start to finish, including when changing form like its titular character.

It may not be well remembered and doesn’t sell for very much on eBay, but that just means it’s easy for you to pick up and enjoy for yourselves. I highly recommend that you do.

BACK TO iSSUE NiNE

DRACULA MENU

DRACULA #9: VLAD THE MAD

So much for the Vampirella cover. We were told last month there’d be one and I assumed it would be a classic reprint, what with the comic’s cancellation at #10 decided but there being a need for an extra cover this month, the second half of an American strip taking the lead position inside (and they probably didn’t want to pay out for a new cover for a cancelled comic). But instead, #9 of Dark Horse International’s Dracula has this very basic (it feels rushed) cover by Woodrow Pheonix, letterer on Crusade in Aliens.

Lying to people about “sovereignty” and “losing control” in order to gain power… that wouldn’t happen today, surely?

On the editorial page we’re told the next issue will include a “feature-length” chapter of Vlad the Impaler to finish off this real-life prequel strip. With hindsight we know this was because it would be the final issue. At least they knew ahead of time so they had the chance to properly finish off the imported Topps Comics strip. First up, this penultimate issue contains the next 16 pages of chapter two, as ever written by Roy Thomas, drawn by Esteban Maroto, coloured by Paul Mounts and lettered by John Costanza.

The mass murdering Vlad has allied himself with Christianity while his enemy Mehmed the Conqueror allies himself with none other than Radu, Vlad’s younger brother. The plan is to annex Wallachia and install Radu as the Prince. Radu promises the people sovereignty of their country but only if they back him. Lying to people about “sovereignty” and “losing control” in order to gain power… that wouldn’t happen today, surely?

After losing a series of battles, Vlad pleas with other countries to come to his aid but to no avail. However, this doesn’t stop his Religious Crusade as he slices across Europe killing thousands in the name of the Christian god, the people suffering as a result. “My poor peasants moaned at their loss,” a caption upon an image of the slaughtered poor says. “But commoners cannot appreciate the measures a besieged Prince must take on their behalf.” Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it, as they say.

Instead of helping diseased peasants he uses them, sending them into other countries and military troop gatherings to infect and weaken them. His callousness and self-interest drive the story and I must say it’s compulsive reading, even if everything about him disgusts me. His tactics look like they could be working until a mis-timed attack fails and only serves to rouse Mehmed from his complacency, putting Vlad on the back foot and leading to a desperate, horrifying action.

Originally intending to take Wallachia by force, The Forest of the Impaled shocks Mehmed into retreating for the first time, leaving Radu behind to become Prince on his own. Elsewhere, we find out the woman Vlad captured and forced to be his “love” is now named ‘Transylvania’. He describes her as being, “Near at hand, yet some part of her forever unattainable, uncontrollable”. This is very different to Mina. This woman is a slave, forced into a physical relationship with the Prince. An arrow does bring a message that ends with her suicide but as you can see it’s not a message from an enemy lying about the death of her one true love.

Instead, the thought of her horrible existence becoming even worse is the reason she takes her own life. This tears Vlad apart and he leads his pitiful army to Hungary and an ally, but the Hungarian leader has no stomach for war. Instead, through a convoluted pretence he separates Vlad from his troops and imprisons him, albeit in a palace! Forged letters are sent to all of his allies and enemies telling them he’s back on the side of the Sultan. With this news and his lonely existence he slowly goes crazy.

The cliffhanger is dreadfully forced. We know where this particular retelling of history will end up and I think it would’ve been more suspenseful to just finish it with him in his crazed state. The battles are also beginning to become much of a muchness but Vlad’s overall arc and the elements that (sadly) mirror politics in our modern world are fascinating. The final chapter should be interesting.

The Bloodlines news pages are light on much of interest, however Sound Bites does quote the legendary Christopher Lee who of course played Dracula earlier in his career (although to me he’ll always be Scaramanga). Such a shame his quote shows up the fact that he either hadn’t seen the film or wasn’t paying attention, as he attributes Anthony Hopkins to the title role. Whoops.

The second and final part of Vampirella: Death’s Dark Angel is shorter than last time but packs a lot in. With no blood substitute she knows she’ll not be able to control her urges and she’ll end up feeding on Wade. But this is just what he wants, so she continues to fight against it. Adam and Conrad Van Helsing are also in the cell and she finds herself opening up to the younger of the two (Conrad was knocked unconscious by Wade). However, having been shot, Adam collapses and the blood from his wound forces some primal instinct inside Vampirella. She breaks free of her chains but as she’s about to feast on her new ally she sees his face and with all her strength pushes back against the urge.

Of course this is when Conrad awakens and for the umpteenth time he gets the wrong idea and tries to kill her, but ends up killing the corrupt cop as he enters their cell and Adam and Vampirella let him believe he’s staked her instead. I like Adam and I understand part of his likability comes from the predicament he’s found himself in between his dad and a good vampire, but Conrad is just an annoying caricature by this point. Even Von Goosewing wasn’t this inept in Count Duckula! And why can he no longer sense her like he did before?

The demon, Skaar attacks the Helsings then suddenly just disappears. This is because Wade has finally forced the starving vampire to bite him! But as Skaar explains, Vampirella isn’t from Earth; she’s an alien, and her race can’t transform people, only kill them. It turns out Skaar was originally a human, namely Wade’s father! Having spent many years as a demon serving penance for his own life, he wasn’t serving Wade. Rather, he was merely waiting for his son’s death because only a soul blacker than his own could take his place and finally release him from his demonic prison.

This was a surprise ending! It’s solemn and moving before becoming horrifying on the final page, although Wade deserves everything he gets. However, does this mean Vampirella did kill the man on the plane? I assumed before the serum she could take what she needed without killing. A question for another time. I hope we get one final outing for her in the final issue. (UPDATE: We do not.) Given how she’s dressed I’ve been surprised at how maturely written and interesting the stories have been, eradicating my initial misgivings.

This month’s author interview is with Kim Newman so that promised series of female authors is disappointingly dead in the water. I remember Newman as a film reviewer on TV back in the 90s and I never liked him. To me, he was the kind of clichéd reviewer who thought they were right and everyone else was wrong and this plays out in this interview with the comic’s Dave Hughes.

Kim’s novel, Anno Dracula is a sequel to the original book set in an alternate world where Dracula wasn’t killed by Van Helsing, instead wooing Queen Victoria and carrying out his dastardly plan to turn England into a kingdom of vampires. He wooed Victoria? What about Mina? Kim admits he mainly used other authors’ fictional characters (Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Jekyll etc.) in the book, yet at the same time criticises other Dracula sequels for copying moments from the original book! That’s a bit rich. He also calls everyone who didn’t like his book “fat anoraks”. So yep, he’s definitely the person I remember.

Much more interesting is a look at the Mega-CD game of the film. We were promised last month (and on the contents page of this issue) a review of the game but instead it’s very much a reworded press release compiled by Amiya Lopez, complete with a guide to what a Mega-CD actually was for the uninitiated. The last sentence of the main article kind of gives it away that they hadn’t actually played it.

I’ve very fond memories of that time, of reading those first years of Edge magazine and getting excited at the sudden leaps in videogame technology. While I personally invested in a Panasonic 3DO (and loved it), I have a fondness for most of the tech from that time and the constant add-ons for the Sega Mega Drive always fascinated me. They’re very much of their time and I enjoyed this little look at a game I’d never seen before, even if it was apparently terrible.

To round up, despite hindsight telling us the editorial writer knew cancellation was on the way, the letters page still asks readers to write in with suggests of how they’d like the comic to evolve over the coming months. They were in for a shock four weeks later, and not of the good kind. We’ll see how things are (hopefully) wrapped up on Sunday 14th September 2025.

iSSUE EiGHT < > iSSUE TEN

DRACULA MENU

DRACULA #8: VLAD THE CAD

Another powerful image from Esteban Maroto welcomes us to the eighth edition of Dark Horse International’s Dracula monthly from 1993, the third issue since the comic lost its connection to the new film. It’s the strongest issue yet under its new guise, with no less than three enjoyable strips. The main 12-page Dark Legend A-Borning: Part One is again written by Roy Thomas, drawn by Esteban, coloured by Paul Mounts and lettered by John Costanza. Castle Dracula is complete. In a year? It does lead to showing a bit of Vlad’s dark wit, though. Many didn’t survive the build and those that did were impaled for their treachery. He explains, “Castle Dracula became, in essence, their… life’s work.”

The man thought he was hilarious. He also seems to live in his own little world. Above you can see examples of how he saw himself. Perhaps an insight into how evil men somehow still see themselves as the hero of their story. Throughout Transylvania others don’t share his opinion and are rising up to challenge him. So Vlad sends an emissary to convince the people to swear loyalty to him. When they continue to rise up he says giving them a chance was the Christian thing to do but now he’ll kill them all. During one such slaughter he comes across a woman whose husband has been slain and this leads to the most horrific moment in the series thus far.

The comic glosses over some of the history, such as his hatred towards the Germanic communities: “The reasons are historically complicated and, in the end, unimportant”. Then again, the strip works best when it focusses on key moments rather than trying to squeeze everything in. A former Hungarian ally by the name of Benedict De Boither meets with Vlad in a particularly gruesome scene where he’s eating a feast in a field surrounded by his victims slowly dying on spikes. De Boither is terrified and grovels at his feet. In return for this undying loyalty (if he isn’t loyal, he’ll die) he’s made ambassador: “For you know how to speak to one ruler on behalf of another”.

The war continues and we see montages of monasteries being burned, monks fleeing, and Vlad in shock that they’d then tell stories that made him out to be a monster. Only Mehmed the Conqueror remains on his long list of enemies and when he sends envoys to see Vlad what do you think happens? No prizes for guessing. Then, above, Pope Pius II isn’t exactly Leo XIV when he calls for death to unbelievers and Vlad is quick to step up. As you can see there are a few digs at the church, such as others not wanting to partake in this so-called “crusade” because of a lack of guaranteed riches.

I’m feeling more enthused about the Vlad the Impaler story as it develops. It’s moved on from a crammed, drab history book with fantastic art to a gripping retelling of history with fantastic art. I think that first chapter had a lot of ground to cover to get us to his adult life and his positions of power, which of course would be the time of most interest to fans of the film. Splitting it in two was necessary here but that ended up giving a bad impression of the strip in #6. That chapter’s second part (the following month) and now this month’s are quite the thrill ride. I just hope we get to the end before cancellation!

Dave Hughes’ Bloodlines news pages start off well with some James Bond song lyrics that are only there because they suit the subject at hand. Still, I’ve got the song in my head now. News is thin on the ground it seems and I take issue with the seeming indignation that the director of Pretty Woman can direct something completely different, or the shock that Gary Oldman is also directing.

Can you imagine what would be written here when (the excellent) Tom Cruise was announced as the lead for Interview with a Vampire? I’ve always been fascinated with how writers, actors and directors can turn their hands to different projects, but if Twitter over the years has shown us anything it’s that others are far too quick to judge. Even Anne Rice herself fell foul of this but would later recant when she saw Tom in the role during filming. Maybe we’ll get to the end of the comic’s run before the announcement?

José González takes over art duties on the 11-page classic Vampirella back up strip. Only credited online with this character he won awards for bringing her to the page over a long period of time. He’s credited with creating the style for her and her strip that’s been used ever since. There’s definitely a more mature, gothic horror vibe to it this month and for the first time it’s not a complete tale.

Part one of Death’s Dark Angel is written as always by Archie Goodwin. Beginning with the deaths of two grave robbers by a demon, we find out it’s a less powerful one than Vampirella has dealt with previously but it’s still bargaining with humans, including a vile rich man called Mr. Wade. Wade has less than a year to live yet still ignores his doctors, having lived far beyond his predicted lifespan thanks to a deal with this demon (another follower of Chaos) for his eternal soul after he passes.

As you can see Wade could just as easily be the villain in a modern strip, so this issue’s story feels more contemporary. Especially when a local cop corrupted by Wade’s wealth and power fabricates crimes in order to bring in the Helsings. The demon captures Vampirella but, sensing something different about her, spares her and chains her up instead. The Helsings have been captured in order to confirm whether she could grant Wade eternal life as one of the undead. Of course, once they’re in the same room as her Conrad reacts accordingly! Surely it’s time for Adam to step up and save her after everything that’s happened so far?

This brings back the mystery at the heart of their story arc. Vampirella was indeed on the same plane as the brother of Conrad Van Helsing when it was struck by lightning and crashed, and when Conrad dug up the grave he discovered bite marks on his neck and drove a stake through his heart. (Just to be sure.) He blames Vampirella but, while she did have to feed off humans before the serum she now uses, we don’t know if she fed on his brother or whether her feeding killed.

The only downside to this chapter is Vampirella herself doesn’t have much to do other than be kidnapped. Saying that, her presence is always felt because she’s still what drives the story for all of the other characters. For the first time I’m actually feeling empathy for the lead and I’m hoping for some revelations and development next time. From not-so-great beginnings she’s now the best part of the comic.

In #5 we had the pleasure of a short extra back up strip and I’m pleased to say another from the 60s US comic Creepy (where Vampirella’s strips are lifted from) is included here. Taken from the first issue it’s written by Archie and drawn by Reed Crandal (Tales From the Crypt, The Vault of Horror, Flash Gordon) and the inhabitants of a spooky town are being terrorised by a string of murders apparently committed by a vampire.

We meet a newly married couple, in which the wife is constantly trying to convince her husband they should go out more, that being in bed all day and awake all night isn’t natural. He argues that’s when he must work and when they can also enjoy the nightlife. To begin with it reads awfully old fashioned. Why didn’t she know about his way of life before getting married? The set up seems ridiculous but something struck me about that breakfast juice being all she needed on the page above.

Throughout its six pages are we really supposed to think she’s so stupid as to not realise he’s a vampire? The hints are so obvious we question why she can’t see what’s right in front of her. That is, until the final page. She finally susses it out and opens the curtain to let the sunlight in but she’s the one who dies! It’s a great little tale and just the sort of thing this comic should have more of. Both of these little one-off strips so far have had excellent twists that I didn’t fully see coming. In both I was convinced I knew what it was going to be and both times I’ve been happily proven wrong.

The feature about the role-playing game mentioned on the cover takes two pages to tell us absolutely nothing about it, then on the Fang Mail letters page the results of a competition produced a surprisingly funny moment. It’s also announced that Vampirella will be the cover star next month, showing how important she’s become to the comic. Alternatively, maybe editor Dick Hansom knew the end was near and didn’t want to commission a new cover and it’ll just be a classic Creepy one. We’ll find out in five weeks.

This has been a fantastic issue. While the features may be lacking compared to those in previous issues the three strips are some of the best of the whole run. The comic is really finding its feet after the transition from ‘Bram Stoker’s Dracula‘ to simply ‘Dracula‘. Unfortunately many jumped ship when the transition happened and missed out on this. We’ll find out if they missed more goodness when #9 comes to the blog on Sunday 17th August 2025.

iSSUE SEVEN < > iSSUE NiNE

DRACULA MENU

DRACULA #7: TALES FROM THE CRYPT

On this day back in 1993 came the seventh edition of Dark Horse International’s Dracula comic, now firmly in its post-movie adaptation stage. Irish artist Kilian Plunkett’s cover was unique to the UK comic, what with the issue containing part two of the same American issue of Topps Comics’ Vlad the Impaler from last month. Blog regulars should recognise the name too, as Kilian contributed the superb cover to #8 of Aliens in a completely different style.

The 13-page second part of Roy Thomas’ strip kicks off with defeat. Vlad’s time in his late father’s role of Prince of Wallachia was short-lived after the Sultan who raised him to be a brutal warrior died. The sultan’s son, Mehmed the Conqueror sought to invade and take over all of Europe, so Vlad allied himself with the Hungarians to defend his home of Transylvania against Mehmed’s ally and the man who killed his family, Danesti. After more history book-like retelling of battles he chases him down.

But Vlad’s actions weren’t to protect the people of the land. As a plague hit the country the poor were ignored and left to die so that he could march to defend Christendom and avenge his father’s death. That’s right, he was fighting for power in the name of god while ignoring those in need. Some things don’t change. At one point he sees a comet in the sky and in a rare bit of fun he tells readers how he wouldn’t know anything about it until he met someone called Halley hundreds of years later.

After this, a brief moment of what appears to be open-minded kindness takes over Vlad. He doesn’t hunt down Danesti’s supporters, instead explaining how he knows they simply believed in their leader and did as they were told. He invites the royal court and their families to an Easter feast and begins to describe the castle he wishes to have built in his name, Castle Dracula. Then the other shoe drops. He shall force them to build it.

The art is just as superb as it was last month. Esteban Maroto’s line work and Paul Mounts’ colours lend a seriousness to it all. The grotesque moments really are grotesque and the power behind the man is palpable when he launches into a tirade against those who sucked up to him the first chance they got, when they’d previously called for his death.

All of a sudden the rich and powerful, who were all too happy to stomp over those less fortunate than them to retain their positions, are pleading for leniency. The elderly ask to be left behind, to be spared the many years of hardship ahead. In response, Vlad beheads and impales them as an act of treachery and it’s this image that’s left to imprint itself on our minds as the final page of the strip this month.

While the script still feels like those strange little historicals found in year one of Marvel UK’s Transformers (Dracula’s script brought to the page with skill by letterer John Costanza) the art once again elevates it. The fact the story slows a bit to concentrate on one battle and its aftermath helps too. It no longer feels rushed and it’s beginning to develop a bit of depth to its main character. That in particular bodes well for future issues.

On to the Bloodlines news pages. The film was a “loose adaptation”? Oh dear, is Dave Hughes turning against the movie he hyped so much now that the comic is no longer a tie-in? Francis Ford Coppola’s movie updated the racist undertones of the original novel to modern sensibilities, but to describe it in this way is rather odd. I’d forgotten all about the fact the movie brought a brief resurgence in monster movies and I’d like to see Robert De Niro as Frankenstein’s monster, so that might be one for this Hallowe’en.

I wonder if The Mummy film mentioned here is what would eventually become the Brendan Frazer and Rachel Weisz movie released six years later? What would Dave have made of it not being a horror film? That section under ‘Neck Romancers’ really hasn’t aged well and it’s shocking to see this reported on as something normal, and yet again the writer’s obsession with Sadie Frost returns, despite the actor being English, not Eastern European.

The Mega-CD game is generously described as receiving “rave reviews”. In reality, UK magazine Mega Power described it as, “One of the best movie tie-ins to date, but still an appallingly bad game.” Given how the game would only work on a Mega-CD, which was a very expensive add-on to the Sega Mega Drive, it’s a rather niche prize. Sadly, it also looks like the promised series of interviews with female horror writers is already making way for men.

The Vampirella back up strip, still written by Archie Goodwin and drawn by Tom Sutton, sees Adam and Conrad Van Helsing (the latter of which is confirmed as blind) catch up with the alien vampire heroine but the younger Adam is incapable of killing her. We’ve seen hints that his newly developed psychic powers may be picking up clues as to her good nature but Conrad doesn’t want to hear it and fears she’s hypnotised him.

The Carnival of the Damned sees Vampirella head to a wonderfully atmospheric fun fair like something out of an episode of Tales of the Crypt. We meet Pendragon, a drunken mess of a magician who fears the Crimson Chronicles book when he sees it in the hands of Vampirella. She explains she made a promise to a dying man to hunt down all who follow it. The Van Helsings are also here, Conrad convinced Vampirella is evil because he can sense evil so strongly around him. Um, Adam? You maybe want to explain the carnival to him? 

It seems the carnival’s owner summoned one of the servants of chaos to save him from financial ruin but he soon discovered he was being tricked in order to bring forth demons, so Pendragon burned the book and it destroyed the carnival. With only half his power brought forth, the demon is the new owner and can hold back the flames to stop killing everyone but in doing so they’re trapped, unable to leave.

While searching for Vampirella, Adam enters the House of Mirrors and sees a vision of his mum being killed by a vampire! He tries to break the glass to get to her and gets sucked in. We find out Ashton (the human form of the demon) feeds off souls in this way to slowly gain enough power to break through into our world. Sensing Vampirella, he’d planted a mental vision in her head to entice her to find the carnival.

If he can get her to read from the book he can access all the power he needs. It’s a complete tale told in 14 pages and I’ll hand it to Archie, it contains enough story to fill a strip twice the length without feeling crammed in. It has that horror anthology feel and I think it works a treat. Her first strip may have been forgettable but since then she’s been the highlight of the comic. I also like the fact this doesn’t boil down to an action scene, instead it’s a battle between the minds of Ashton and Vampirella. 

On TV this would’ve needed impressive acting so it’s a brave move for a comic and Tom pulls it off brilliantly; it’s suitably tense and horrific. The Van Helsings also escape while the carnival burns and it’s here that I have my only gripe. Conrad is convinced Vampirella set the fire to kill them, yet when they thank Pendragon for saving them he doesn’t take the chance to clear her name, instead giving a cryptic “I was just following another” response.

After a brief interview with Anne Billson (which is nowhere near as in-depth and interesting as last month’s with Anne Rice) comes the letters column, Fang Mail. However, the highlight of the page is the first mention of Jurassic Park in the comics checklist. Like Dracula it’s three-weekly to begin with, the first two issues detailed here and on the back page is the full-page advert for the launch.

Dracula continues to be a unique comic, one that I’m enjoying a lot. A thoroughly interesting history lesson followed by a classic horror anthology strip (of sorts) is about as different to anything else I’m ever likely to include on the blog, so I’m going to enjoy it while it lasts. I hope you are too and that you’ll come back for #8 on Sunday 13th July 2025.

iSSUE SiX < > iSSUE EiGHT

DRACULA MENU

DRACULA #6: VLAD THE LAD

It’s quite different this month, isn’t it? Although John Bolton’s new logo is reminiscent enough of the movie’s for it to feel like a natural progression for the publication. Inside, the continuation of Vampirella’s story and the Bloodlines news pages help with the transition into something very different too. The movie adaptation was a Topps Comics production in the States and Dark Horse International sticks with them for the next main strip.

Speaking of sticking, there’s a free glow-in-the-dark sticker (which I admit looks a lot better through my iPhone’s lens than in person). It’s a somewhat child-friendly gift for a comic with a strip containing bloody beheadings. In fact, it’s rather strange the comic no longer comes with the “Not suitable for younger readers” warning. Although I doubt the sticker would’ve convinced many parents to buy this for their child!

Movie adaptation writer Roy Thomas is scriptwriter for what is basically another adaptation, this time of history books. A three-issue mini-series marketed in the States as “The True Story” of Dracula, in reality very little of the real Vlad the Impaler made it into the Count character in Bram Stoker’s book, such was Stoker’s limited knowledge of Vlad or the time in which he lived. This issue contains 15 pages of the first chapter but there’s so much crammed in I was surprised after reading it that it wasn’t more.

Introducing himself as Dracula complete with fangs, a crumbling castle and assorted monsters and supernatural entities, he welcomes us to his tale by gliding in on a green mist before presenting “the year the cross-wielders call 1431”. His father, Vlad Dracul is a protector of Christendom, was named after the Order of the Dragon and is the military governor of Transylvania and Prince of Wallachia. He’s actually just a strongman for sultan Muran, receiving fortune, land and protection in return for loyalty and the people’s taxes. We see a happy family life with young Vlad, Mircea (oldest brother) and Radu (the youngest). However, it’s not long until we see their true nature.

Young Vlad snitches on someone questioning why their family name means both “dragon” and “demon” in the country’s native tongue. Taking pride in showing his boys how vicious he can be to anyone who questions him, his father has learned from his overlords who impaled their enemies’ heads on spikes (something Vlad III would later become known for). His father takes them to Gallipoli to learn about how their nations relate to one another, but it’s upon this trip that a major event in Vlad’s life takes place.

Muran has discovered elder Vlad has been playing east and west against each other and reaping the benefits. The Turks had invaded the sultan’s lands of Transylvania and Wallachia and Vlad had stood back and let them, thinking he could befriend whoever the ultimate victors would be. In revenge for this disloyalty his two youngest sons are taken in as “guests”, but they’ll be treated as hostages if their father is ever disloyal again.

Young Vlad trains to be just as vicious a warrior and becomes good friends with the sultan’s son Mehmed, learning how to rule through fear while his younger brother becomes loved by the harem! During the next year their father proves his disloyalty yet again and in an uprising he’s killed, whilst his eldest son and heir to his throne Mircea is buried alive. Muran then passes down their belongings to young Vlad who he sees as a more loyal successor.

I’ll admit it’s difficult to review this. Esteban Moroto’s (Conan, Red Sonja, Cadillacs and Dinosaurs) art, Paul Mounts’ (Fantastic Four, Ultimates, Reborn) colours and returning letterer John Costanza evoke a lovely classical feel despite this being a new comic at the time, and I find it fascinating because I never knew any of the story of Vlad the Impaler beyond the few pieces in Dracula which were somewhat accurate. However, I’m not sure if it works as a comic strip.

As a history lesson it’s very entertaining and I was drawn in by the story of this man in his youth. But, as a comic strip it reads like an adaptation of a text book, with chunks of the text turned into speech for the players. So yes, it’s a strange one. The original story it’s based on is interesting, and I look forward to comparing it to Dracula, but it’s presented in such a stilted way in its script.

In the middle of the comic is a multi-page, in-depth interview with Anne Rice, writer of the Interview with the Vampire series amongst others. For once it’s not just quotes lifted from various other sources, Dave Hughes actually met the lady herself during what sounds like an exhausting promotional tour. I’ll admit it’s a novel and movie I know nothing about but from reading this and doing a bit of research I have to say I’m intrigued. After last month’s feature on the BBC’s Dracula mini-series this comic is filling up my Hallowe’en viewing rightly.

I’d no idea the novel was released the year before I was born. I’d always assumed it was relatively new when the film was produced. The movie was still in preproduction during this interview and there’s no mention of Tom Cruise. In fact, I was disappointed to read online of Anne’s negative reaction to his casting. However, once she saw the movie she said he “is Lestat” and admitted she was completely wrong (even calling him up to apologise) so now I’m even more eager to watch his performance.

“We want our rewards from life and we don’t sacrifice them to bring justice to all mankind. The whole lure of the sensuous world fascinates me.”

Anne Rice

I’m always fascinated to learn of a writer’s process, whether I’ve read their work or not, and this feature does not disappoint. It covers the original novel’s creation and how long it took to go from initial idea to finished story. There’s also an interesting dissection of the appeal of vampire stories, although this would appear to be flipped on its head a few years later when Buffy became such a huge hit.

The Bram Stoker’s Dracula movie is cited as proof that tastes were changing, although I think Anne’s description of Silence of the Lambs seems a bit overwrought. It’s in the creation of her original novel, the changes made to the character, her belief it wouldn’t work but she kept going, as well as the ultimate reception that combine to be really interesting. It also doesn’t hurt seeing John Bolton’s gorgeous illustrations from the comic book adaptation of her second novel.

(I did ask Siri to play the Sting song mentioned here and I only made it halfway through it.)

There’s no one-off strip like last issue’s Werewolf which I’d have preferred over Vampirella, but fortunately her tale is a vast improvement over her previous entry. It’s a complete 12-page story by Archie Goodwin and drawn by Tom Sutton, in which she is tracked down by a member of the chaos cult. This is done via a cat, so I was immediately enjoying this more than last time. The two villainous characters are a frail elderly lady and her unwilling but ultimately murderous son with echoes of Psycho, released nine years earlier. (Son Lenny even spies on Vampirella through a hole in a wall behind a painting.)

Their backstory boils down to the cat being mind-controlled by Mrs Jethryn because she’s bound to the library building by a curse that allowed her son to be resurrected. After a battle with Vampirella, Lenny’s happy to be killed and finally freed. I can happily report the cat gets a happy ending too. Released from her control it runs off home with the woman’s soul trapped inside, unable to influence the cat or even make her presence known. I’ve no problem with much older strips appearing (for example the classic Machine Man in early issues of Marvel UK’s The Transformers was a great fit) and this small story is fun to read. However, we see Vampirella stealing a raincoat to protect her from the weather… so why can’t she steal some actual clothes?!

Dave returns for his usual Bloodlines news pages and you may wonder why you see Space:1999 here. It’s because of the guest stars who might be of particular interest to readers. I’ll also admit the two-part episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation sounds intriguing, and that’s coming from someone who’s never seen a full episode. I do find it strange Children of the Night’s narration is criticised when you consider how Bram Stoker wrote Dracula.

On a more positive note I was thrilled to see the interview with Anne was just the first of a series with female authors, so that’s something I’m really looking forward to next month. The issue ends with the first letters page, Fang Mail, which is a great name and there’s an advert for Manga Mania which had a whopping 88 more pages yet only cost 45p more. You’ll see examples of these Dark Horse International adverts in a special collection at a later date on the blog.

The comic had proved to be a success while it was adapting the movie with good sales and a good reception from readers. However, now knowing it would be cancelled just a few issues later it’s clear not everyone was a fan of the new contents. Still, I look forward to finding out more about Transylvanian history when #7 hits the blog on Sunday 15th June 2025.

iSSUE FiVE < > iSSUE SEVEN

DRACULA MENU

BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA #5: FiNAL(E) BITE

More and more headlines adorn the front cover of Dark Horse International‘s Bram Stoker’s Dracula as  strips and features are added, the comic morphing like the Prince himself on this great Mike Mignola image. Gone is the glossy cover, replaced with a good quality matte paper throughout that seems to suck up the ink magnificently, and you’ll notice a lack of specific dates on the spine. That’s right, the comic is now an ongoing monthly title instead of a limited series of three-weekly issues. Not that anything is made of this in the editorial. More on this below.

Our main strip runs to 17 pages, concluding the adaptation and again it’s the art that really stands out. The spectacular moments during the final 20 minutes of the film must’ve been daunting for penciller Mike, inker John Nyberg and colourist Mark Chiarello. The minimalist style flies in the face of the film’s production design but it works perfectly, such as with this opening scene above. The carriages aren’t even drawn but it works. (Accompanied by John Costanza‘s lettering of Jonathan’s diary.)

In fact there are some small, incidental panels of individual characters which, if combined in a grid, could make for a lovely minimalist poster for fans of the film. Look at these images below of Jonathan (Keanu Reeves), Arthur (Cary Elwes), Mina (Winona Ryder) and Quincy (Billy Campbell) and imagine that large poster made up of these and likewise panels for all of the others.

The first half of the strip concentrates on the journey to Dracula‘s castle and the inner fight of Mina’s as she struggles between her love for Jonathan, the enforced lust for the Prince and Helsing‘s attempts to save her. As with previous chapters the only negative here is the memory of these scenes from the film making for an unfair comparison. The horseback gunfight was an absolutely thrilling moment as our heroes fought the setting sun, accompanied by Wojciech Kilar‘s booming score. Reading it instead of watching it accentuates just how much their music brought to the scene! Also, the key factor of the setting sun is completely missing apart from one mention in text.

Meanwhile, further ahead at the castle Helsing battles with Mina’s soul. The powerhouse performances by the actors is replaced by some dramatic poses, which are highlighted wonderfully by the lack of detail, the silhouette of Mina over Helsing with the three vampire women scrawled in the background being my favoured panel here. A couple of pages later (after Helsing is seen entering a crypt post-sunrise) we see the ultimate fate of the three watching horrors. It’s surprisingly gore-free given what we’re actually looking at. In fact, gore is something that’s largely been missing throughout the adaptation.

Not that the film relied on gore for its scares, but the comic really dials it down to little more than the odd splash of bold red, such as in Dracula’s final moments after Jonathan slits his throat. From here on it pretty much follows the film shot-for-shot, word-for-word. Well, why would you want to change such a perfect ending? Throughout these months there have been other changes made to the overall film, and there was no way it could match the atmosphere or looks, but what this series did differently to other adaptations was make bold artistic choices.

What we’ve been treated to over these first five issues is nothing short of a work of art. An adaptation of a work of art into another, in fact. For fans of the film it’s just such a unique take, a love letter to the movie. It feels like the team has created a tapestry of the film in comic art and as such it transcends a mere “comics adaptation of the current blockbuster movie”. It’s best enjoyed as a piece of art in this way and when it is it’s the best movie adaptation I’ve ever seen.

Dave HughesBloodlines news pages are chock full of goodies this month (although we’ll try to ignore the creepy description of actor Sadie Frost as “delectable”), beginning with the box office takings of the film so far. Until beginning this series I’d no idea it was this big at the time! Saying “set is the operative word” when describing where it was made is a reference to the fact the whole thing was filmed on huge soundstages. Even the outdoor scenes were elaborate sets, something I wish the comic had delved into in more depth.

There isn’t exactly glowing praise for something they then immediately give away in a competition, I wonder if Coca-Cola had anything to say about the ‘Cult Classic’ logo used on the Evil Force video cover, and after reading the Sound Bites it’s no wonder Gary Oldman loves playing Jackson Lamb so much these days. One last thing of note, I have no idea how that “natural conclusion” was made in the ‘Scarlett Woman’ news item! (Oh, and I’ve given up on the promised Sadie interview ever appearing now.)

Vampirella‘s strip (written by Archie Goodwin, drawn by Tom Sutton) is reduced to seven pages to make way for a second back up, although personally I’m quite glad there’s less this time. The place she found herself in happens to be where a cult is trying to bring forth a demon of chaos and the scantily-clad alien vampire is to be sacrificed in order to do so. The man she fell in love with after five minutes turns out to be the soul of a warlock in a dead man’s body. He saves Vampirella and decides the evil nurse woman will be used as a vessel instead. How romantic. However, when she says no to him he turns on her (which sadly sounds rather familiar these days) and soon he’s trying to sacrifice her again.

She’s saved by the monster from her visions, who is actually the soul of the deceased man inside the withered old body of the warlock. You keeping up? The summoned beast has come for their souls but instead devours all of the cult and the place crumbles under its power. It’s left up in the air whether it made its way through the portal and the strip ends with the revelation that Van Helsing is making his way around the graves of the crashed airplane’s passenger list, staking them all until he finds the vampire he knows was on board. (Such a shame the comic’s ‘Previously’ round up describes this despite it not being mentioned in the previous issue, ruining the twist.)

As my first delve into the world of Vampirella I’m not particularly underwhelmed because I had low expectations (see last issue’s review to find out why). I know it’s an old strip and it’s very much of its time, however I’ll admit there’s intrigue with Helsing’s mission and the chaos demons, so we’ll see if the characterisation of the lead develops more next time.

There’s a fascinating two-page article by Adrian Rigelsford about a forgotten BBC Count Dracula production from the year of my birth, 1977. (The article begins with a play on words based on the pop rock band Transvision Vamp so I was sold immediately!) I didn’t think I’d be interested in some older Dracula adaptation but as soon as I found out Octopussy‘s Kamal Khan himself, Louis Jourdan played the Count I was, ahem, sucked in.

It all sounds fang-tastic (sorry). Originally shown as a three-hour movie and then split into episodes for repeats, at the time of this comic’s publication it was thought to be one of those “lost” BBC shows, which as a Doctor Fan I know all about. However, in a spooky coincidence, in the same month this issue was released the BBC repeated Count Dracula as a two-parter, possibly spurred on by the success of Francis Ford Coppola‘s movie. It hasn’t been broadcast since but was released on DVD in the early 2000s, so there may be a little second-hand purchase for Hallowe’en this year.

Finally, there’s a second six-page back up strip simply called Werewolf. I sighed when I saw a credit for Vampirella’s writer but this is an error, it was actually written by Larry Ivie (Eerie, T.H.U.N.D.E.R. Agents, artist on Castle of Frankenstein) for #1 of Creepy back in 1964 by Vampirella’s Warren Publishing. This story follows a complete asshole of a big game hunter (aren’t they all?) but he’s by no means the hero of the story. Treating local tribespeople like simpletons and beating his assistant, the ultimate outcome of the strip is satisfying as a result.

He’s been hired to track down a fabled immortal beast that’s said to transform into a human during the day. It has never killed but its evil apparently infects those around it. In the end he does indeed track it down and empties bullet after bullet into it to no avail. Not until he hits the one tiny white spot on its body does it fall to the ground. It then turns into a previous animal hunter, who had been cursed to live as the beast until someone else skilled in killing innocent animals could take it down.

The hunter of the story then transforms into the werewolf, doomed to live this way for hundreds of years just like his predecessor. The moral of the story is clear and it’s always fun to see someone who hunts animals for fun get their commence in my book. Or in my comics, I should say. A simple, straight-to-the-point story with some gorgeous art by Frank Frazetta (Famous Funnies, Conan the Barbarian novel covers, album covers and movie posters), this bodes well for the comic’s choice of any additional back up strips from here on. Speaking of which, time to check out that back cover.

There’s a full-page Next Issue back cover just like Aliens had in its #8 and this too was used as advertising across the range. With four more pages (is this where Aliens’ four pages wandered off to?), the origin story of our main character, more Vampirella and an interview (fingers crossed) with Anne Rice, the comic is about to continue morphing into something quite different, heralded by the change in logo away from that of the movie’s. All for the same price though. Which of course is free for you lot, just tune into the OiNK Blog from Sunday 11th May (four weeks from now instead of three).

iSSUE FOUR < > iSSUE SiX

DRACULA MENU

BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA #4: THE CHANGiNG FACE OF EViL

While it’s not the easiest to read (and so wouldn’t have stood out from the cover on newsagent shelves), look closely at Mika Mignola’s cover to this latest edition of Dark Horse International’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula and you’ll spot a new addition to this fourth issue. Vampirella has joined the comic as a back up strip, just as Xenozoic Tales would join the fourth issue of the publisher’s Jurassic Park later in the year.

For both series, sales figures had proved themselves enough that the three-weekly movie adaptations were turned into monthly ongoings, the final chapter split in order to get ahead of the new schedule and introduce readers to new content. Inside this comic, both strips run to 14 pages, Dracula himself getting exactly half the amount as normal. However, Vampirella gets no introduction anywhere and the editorial is still in the hands of Van Helsing.

I’m going to assume once the main strip concludes we’ll no longer have these characterful introductions so I’m enjoying them while they last. The final chapter begins with a scene that simply can’t be conveyed properly through still images, that of Anthony Hopkins devouring his food in the English pub like a savage. The result is a much more restrained version of the character, which is unfortunate.

In fact, I realise this has been the main problem for writer Roy Thomas all this time. It’s just impossible to convey in a comic the wonderful acting choices the talented cast made throughout the movie. However, when we turn the page and Mina questions him on how her best friend Lucy died, we do get one of the film’s rare comedic moments still intact. Darkly comedic of course. Very darkly comedic. 

This chapter includes the burning of the boxes containing Transylvanian soil Dracula had moved to his newly purchased, abandoned Abbey. It includes all of the ancient text, the Latin words spoken by Van Helsing to cleanse the place of evil. But more interestingly for me is the beginning of this scene with the rules of the vampire set out. They were a world apart from the clichéd rules we’d become used to from decades of other movies and TV shows.

Alongside the death of Renfield the main bulk here is dedicated to Mina deciding to join her beloved Count in eternal life. While it’d be impossible to convey how surprisingly touching this scene was (especially given what it was about!) thanks to the excellent performances of Gary Oldman and Winona Ryder, penciller Mike, inker John Nyberg and colourist Mark Chiarello (alongside letterer John Costanza) do an excellent job of portraying their intimacy in what’s actually a shocking moment. For an adaptation of this movie it’s perfect.

The iconic moment of Dracula using one of his nails to slice across his chest, drawing blood for Mina to drink, is presented in a similar fashion. Then the colours are shifted for one panel to highlight the key moment. After two pages of blue this really stands out. Then, interrupted by Jonathan and Van Helsing, Dracula changes into his man bat form and reiterates his anger from the beginning of the film. I always found this the most fascinating and surprising part of the character; a devoted Christian who had sacrificed so much in the name of their God, the religion’s archaic beliefs and the selfish nature of its men betraying him.

I never knew this side of the character from the Dracula films we saw growing up; he and Christianity are essentially two sides of the same coin. While the cross and Van Helsing’s devotion to the faith fight evil, Coppola’s film never let us forget whose fault this was in the first place, why Vlad became what he did. On the flip side, he’s obviously a monster and a mass murderer but we never forget why this happened to him. The film perfectly balances this to such a degree that we’re both horrified and emotionally moved by him.

In the middle of the issue is Bloodlines by Dave Hughes, the usual two-page news section about all things vampiric in the world of 90s entertainment. Dracula’s Oscar nominations are mentioned and, while I could easily look up who did and did not win, I’m going to wait and let the comic tell me, just as readers at the time had to. I’m looking forward to finding out, though.

The competition informs us of the insane lead time needed when working on the comic, the Sound Bites are actually interesting this month with their comparison between 1977 (the year I was born, funnily enough) and 1993 in respect to thoughts about vampire films, and there’s mention of all-night events at the cinema. Personally, I found watching Terminator 1, 2 and Genisys back-to-back in a cinema long enough, never mind a whole night! (Especially given how that place smelled by the end.)

I have to say the choice of image for the award nominations as presented by Columbia Pictures is a strange one. To anyone not familiar with the film they could easy assume Tom Waits was playing the lead character. Then opposite this always-fun news feature is the first page of our black-and-white back up and I breathed a sigh when I saw it. Not of relief, but of disappointment and pessimism.

Over the years I’ve seen Vampirella comics advertised here and there and even as an impressionable teenage boy I always felt her clothing (or lack of) was shamelessly gratuitous. Not that I would’ve used those words as a teenager! As an adult I think she always looked like she was there to appeal to a certain type of male reader, of which I am not. So while researching for this review it was a shock to find out she was co-created by a woman.

Trina Robbins did so much fantastic work to raise the profile of women in comics that I’m rethinking my assumptions about this character

Vampirella was created by Forrest J. Ackerman (literary agent, actor, editor) and Trina Robbins (Wonder Woman, Strip AIDS, GoGirl!) in 1969. Trina did so much fantastic work to raise the profile of women in comics throughout her life I’m rethinking my assumptions about this character. In fact, it was Trina who designed her look. Editor Archie Goodwin then continued to write and develop her.

While the issue gives no official introduction other than the cover headline, there’s a brief history of the character in the strip. So, Earth’s vampires originate from Dracula, a forgotten member of the Vampiri race who left his homeworld (Drakulon) centuries ago only to be corrupted by the demonic entity known as Chaos. Vampirella is the last of her race who came to our planet after her own died out. With no other choice, she has to feed on human blood. However, underneath she’s good so I’m assuming she attacks and drinks but does not kill. Even Dracula was originally peaceful in his story. I also assume the ridiculously revealing costume is how her race dress.

It’d be polite to say this story is “of its time”. While Trina co-created her, this particular story (of which she was not involved in) feels very much like a strip written by men for men. Rescued from the cold by a doctor running a remote retreat for the rich, he’s amputated her apparently rotting wings and is clearly lusting after her, despite an angry nurse claiming he must keep his distance from Vampirella while dangling a satanic-looking necklace.

The best part is a graveyard scene depicting a descendent of Van Helsing‘s digging up bodies to ram stakes through their hearts. This might explain why this story has been chosen as a back up and it’s an interesting segue, but in the main I’m disappointed with our main character. She’s scared of the doctor, terrified even, and for most of the strip is portrayed as having a strong will to resist whatever drugs she’s on. She’s piecing together the mystery of what’s going on but then suddenly she’s snogging the man after a simple slug of his blood.

The strip is from 1970 so it’s very much from a time when a strong female lead character was rare. In fact, that was still a rare thing when Barrie Tomlinson created Kitten Magee in Wildcat comic in the late 1980s! But this was the 70s, so apparently a strong female character still had to be dressed to appeal to men’s baser instincts and fall for the man full of red flags at the drop of a hat. This doesn’t read well today.

Back to the comic’s title character and the Inside Dracula making-of series by Gary Gerani and Dave Hughes is only one page this month, possibly to spread the final part over two issues just like the strip. A piece about Salem’s Lot by Seamus Ryan is the random substitute for one page, in which he discusses its vastly different cuts. Disappointingly, there’s still no sign of the promised Sadie Frost interview and by this point I’m just going to assume it’s not going to appear.

The mention of deleted scenes reminded me I still hadn’t checked them out so I got my Apple TV on and watched them today. I like making-of features but usually skip deleted scenes (they’ve been deleted for a reason). After watching them for Dracula I can still say the only exception are the ones from The Lost World: Jurassic Park, which I’d love to see added back in to that movie. Oh, and Dracula’s final box office? On a budget of $40,000,000 it raked in a superb $215,862,692 according to Box Office Mojo. Superb! And well deserved!

The final paragraph of director Francis Ford Coppola’s view on why he makes movies reminds me of why I write. So it feels like a fitting note to end the review on. I’m intrigued to find out what direction the comic is headed in and look forward to the art depicting the movie’s climax in just three weeks, on Sunday 13th April 2025.

iSSUE THREE < > iSSUE FiVE

DRACULA MENU

BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA #3: iCONiC EYE CANDY

Mike Mignola’s cover may not be as intricately painted as last month’s but through clever used of colour, and the changing of the logo to suit, we’ve another atmospheric introduction to the latest issue of Dark Horse International’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula. This third edition went on sale this day 32 years ago and continues with its regular format for now, with a 28-page chapter of the movie adaptation and four pages of extras bringing up the rear.

I have to say I still love the comic’s editorial page every issue. Written in the style of the Van Helsing character from the film it’s an inventive and fun way to kickstart things every three weeks. It certainly makes the plain contents pages of DHI’s Jurassic Park comic feel like a wasted opportunity. Here, Anthony Hopkins’ voice reminds us who some of the other characters are who’ll be featuring heavily in this issue, an issue with a surprising amount of iconic imagery, which I’ll get to later.

After such a great start in the first two editions, as we get into the meat of the second half of the film it feels like the strip is having to play catch up. It’s racing along, jumping back and forth between scenes after only paying lip service to them. Even as a fan of the film who watches it every Hallowe’en it felt confusing, like it’s been hastily chopped up and squeezed in rather than being properly adapted to another medium.

Don’t get me wrong, thanks to an interview with the writer of The Lost World: Jurassic Park’s adaptation we know how difficult it can be to adapt a movie to comic form and this film in particular couldn’t have been easy! I get that. So please do not see any critiques as being critical of writer Roy Thomas, this must have been a next-to-impossible task, it’s an incredibly visual film and delivers a lot of its thrills through original direction.

There are moments where I’d defy anyone who hasn’t seen the film in a long time to instantly recognise what’s happening. I last saw it only a few of months ago and I still had to reread some pages and look longer at some panels to remember what was meant to be going on. The problem is it’s suddenly trying too hard to follow the film moment-for-moment, instead of adapting it like we know the team is more than capable of from the previous issues .

As the film used its quick cuts, speeded up moments and dramatic music we easily followed what was going on while at the same time feeling bombarded and breathless, as intended by Coppola. But trying to do that with still images just isn’t going to work. However, the quieter moments between Dracula and Mina are again the highlight of the issue and highly enjoyable.

Special mention again to letterer John Costanza for the various forms of diary entries. A pattern emerges as I continue to read. The human moments are handled particularly well but the horror elements fall flat and end up confusing. Thankfully, there are some dramatic moments that come from the more chatty human scenes instead of the visual flair of Coppola, and in these instances the comic’s potential shines.

I mentioned iconic imagery, but what do I mean by that? Simply that there were certain images in the film that perfectly captured its intent as a whole. There are also fan favourite moments, as well as scenes which perfectly summed up Francis Ford Coppola’s vision with just a quick snippet.

These are largely intact here and the first is that iconic moment when the Prince and Mina dance by candlelight, Winona’s character in that elegant and memorable red dress set against the darkness, perfectly capturing the colour palette of the film and thus encapsulating more than the moment itself. These were moments also used in the marketing at the time and ever since for good reason.

The ancient texts telling the story of Vlad, Sadie Frost’s Lucy character receiving her final bite to transform her and the giant man bat moment that the behind-the-scenes feature below actually talks about. All of these and more are present and correct, and all are brought to the page superbly by penciller Mike, inker John Nyberg and colourist Mark Chiarello.

The creepy, terrifying crypt scene involving the now undead Lucy takes up a good chunk of the end of this issue’s chapter and I love Mark’s decision to not use any shading whatsoever when drawing her. As a result she stands out from the page as an ethereal entity, the contrast of the blood feeling all the more gruesome.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m still enjoying this but in a different way than it was intended. Instead of reading it like a normal comic and being drawn into its story it’s like a love letter from the artists to the film. I’ve spoken at length in the previous reviews about how the artists have been able to craft the same atmosphere through a brave, original stylistic choice and it continues here. But you might struggle if you’re hoping the comic can tell the story on its own.

Dracula was released in the UK right at the beginning of 1993 and 32 years later as I began this real time read through a certain other movie was released, coincidentally enough. This timing passed me by until I read these panels below, which are our final highlight of the issue’s strip.

To the extras now and as usual things kick off with Inside Coppola’s Dracula and this time Gary Gerani is focussing on the special effects of the film. Famously, director Francis eschewed the new CGI trend and very deliberately used old fashioned movie-making techniques to give it the feeling of something made around the time in which it was set. Imaginative and genius use of classic “smoke and mirrors” techniques were used and interestingly we get the origin of that phrase here too.

The comparisons to Lucifer are interesting in explaining the use of a literal bat man rather than the usual, clichéd tiny bat in basically all other vampire films up to that point. The explanation here makes so much more sense. The transformation into a wolf was new to me when I first saw it as a teenager, werewolves were a completely separate entity from Dracula as far as I was concerned, so it was a surprise to be proven wrong. 

“Two newish magazines with more than a passing interest in the orthodontic removal of corpuscles via the jugular vein.”

Dave Hughes

But what about that hand prop? I’ve never seen any photo or video of it but I can’t help but think of the hand effects from the short-lived 80s TV series Manimal. There’s a blast from the past! I think the prop for this film would’ve looked quite a bit better though, to say the least. Moving on to the Bloodlines news pages and Dave Hughes certainly doesn’t hold back with some of his reviews this time around.

Interesting to read that some comics prices really weren’t that much different to today (despite complaints about today’s prices), Ellen Datlow’s anthology books certainly sound interesting and on the second page some quotes from Winona Ryder and Gary Oldman are missing the context given to them last issue and so unfortuanately come across as tabloid-like here. That’s a shame because otherwise this is the most enjoyable Bloodlines yet. Written in a more relaxed and chatty style it’s really rather fun, even if it is missing the promised interview with Sadie Frost that I was particularly looking forward to.

We’re obviously approaching the end of the movie’s storyline and after such a promising and atmospheric start I find myself more excited about what’s to come after the main strip ends rather than it’s climax. The comic still offers up that art though and the extras are fun, then there’s that mysterious future for the remainder of the issues to find out about. That’s enough for me to eagerly anticipate #4 on Sunday 23rd March 2025.

iSSUE TWO < > iSSUE FOUR

DRACULA MENU

BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA #2: HUNGRY LiKE THE WOLF

This evocative cover by John Bolton (Jurassic Park, Aliens, Black Dragon) shows us Count Dracula descending on poor Lucy Westerna (played by Sadie Frost in her first film role) and it has me wondering exactly what the comic will show from certain scenes in the film. We’ll find out as we creak open the coffin lid and gaze upon #2 of Dark Horse International’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula. But first, I assumed my copy would be missing its free gift and was very happy to be proven wrong with this glossy movie poster still attached to the staples!

Returning to the opening pages and again Anthony Hopkins’ voice welcomes readers to the second chapter of the movie adaptation, which three weeks ago I praised for its art direction, style and atmosphere. Although, at times it could be confusing to anyone who hadn’t seen the film in a while. This was because some scenes didn’t translate that well to the page. Fortunately, this time around there’s less of this criticism to be found.

We kick things off with Jonathan Harker (Keanu Reeves) trying to find his way out of the castle and instead traipsing through a living nightmare, before trying and spectacularly failing to kill the Count while he sleeps. (This moment in the film belongs to Gary Oldman!) Over in England a vast storm unlike anything ever recorded has hit the country and we may be missing the powerful music from this moment but it plays in my head as I read the following few pages.

As we see the animals going wild and a wolf escaping the zoo, the rain soaking Lucy and the storm getting worse, we know it’s all because the ship with Dracula on board is getting ever closer, hence his eyes in the sky watching over everything. While the film offered no narration for this moment it was clear what was happening. It’s a very stylised moment, very Coppola, and can’t have been easy to bring to the page.

Any fan of the film will know what’s coming next

It works better than last issue, but of course I’ve seen the film recently so I don’t know how easily it could be followed without narrative captions for new readers or lapsed viewers. I personally like the fact there aren’t captions, just the diary entries now and again. It matches the film in this regard, but in a different medium should it have contained more text? The jury is out, but if you know the film (or even the original story) you’ll enjoy this sequence and the lovely, shadowy art once more by penciller Mike Mignola, inker John Nyberg and colourist Mark Chiarello.

Any fan of the film will know what’s coming next and it relates to what I said about the cover. While there’s no obvious nudity it’s still surprising to see the scene play out in a comic if I’m honest. Although, without all of the dramatic build up and the actual horror and suspense leading up to this moment it feels a bit random and gratuitous.

After this terrifying sexual encounter comes one of my very favourite scenes in the whole film, when Dracula and Mina meet properly for the first time on the streets of London and simply chat. Gary and Winona Ryder were perfect in this scene and it pretty much all plays out in the comic, taking up eight pages in total of Roy Thomas’ adaptation (his script lettered by John Costanza). Of course the medium doesn’t lend itself to translating the slow, deliberate acting in what is a touching, yet mysterious scene (unless you read it that way of course), but the art remains fascinating.

Their initial introduction ends on this image of a bat rising out of the scene against a pure white background. This is an example of the comic taking inspiration from the visuals of the film and producing its own to get across narrative elements of the story it may have otherwise struggled with. Opposite from this is the rear of the poster so coincidentally this feels like a natural chapter end in itself.

The comic has also improved its translation of such moments to the page. Take when Arthur Holmwood (Carey Elwes) comes to check on his fiancée Lucy, who has been in the care of Dr. Jack Seward (Richard E. Grant). The visual moment in question is actually a scene transition after Arthur agrees to bring in Van Helsing, finally admitting to himself there’s something ‘else’ wrong with his love.

Lucy is holding onto her dress collar and we zoom in past it to see the two red holes in her neck where she was bitten by Dracula in his monstrous wolf man form. Just like in the film, as we get closer to the bite marks they turn into his eyes and then into the eyes of the wolf that had escaped from the zoo. This transition takes us back to the London scene, ending with ol’ Drac easily taming the wolf, and the wolf then letting Mina pet it; a key moment in the development of our lead characters’ relationship.

While earlier in this review I did lament how some scenes could’ve done with more explanation and room inside the comic, I’m glad to say the London scene isn’t the only one that gets space to breathe. Some of the smaller moments are actually given prominence, such as when Dracula arrives at the window of Lucy’s bedroom. 

This could’ve been summed up in a couple of panels but instead it’s presented in a way that adds such atmosphere to the comic. In that regard I think it’s the best example to sum up the title as a whole and a page that could be framed for the wall by anyone who’s a fan of the film. Perhaps alongside that poster.

Moving on to the extra features and again it’s made up of Inside Dracula and Bloodlines, the making-of and news pages respectively. It’s here I take issue with one of the headlines on the cover. “Interviews (plural) with the cast of the smash-hit movie”, editor Dick Hansom boasted. What we actually get are two pages with small profiles of six of the cast members. For three of them we get some quotes taken from actual interviews elsewhere and a fourth where the quote is from Francis Ford Coppola instead.

There are some interesting nuggets here, such as Francis’ insistence on a young cast in keeping with the novel (which went against the grain of previous adaptations) and Winona’s role in getting the whole thing started in the first place, which was touched upon last issue. I can sympathise with how reading the novel is described as a “formidable task” and in Sadie’s profile the comic mentions “the much-publicised sensual aspects”, which you just know referred to what British tabloid rags thought were the most important scenes in the film.

Bloodlines rounds up the movie’s takings so far and the glut of vampire flicks which went into production off the back of the news Francis Ford Coppola was making Dracula. News of Tale of a Vampire has a different feel to it now, after we tragically lost the great Julians Sands in 2023. I’d never heard of this film but the role seems just perfect for him so I’ll probably track it down on a streaming service and check it out.

The mystery behind Innocent Blood’s release was probably more to do with its complete flop in the States than with our movie. Described on Wikipedia as a “mixture of the vampire, gangster and buddy cop genres” but with a ton of nudity and gore, it doesn’t scream ‘John Landis’ to me. As for Interview With the Vampire, I can’t find proof of Sting being approached but coincidentally Julian Sands was considered!

Then, on the glossy inside back cover is the first of Dark Horse International’s subscriptions pages for their range, something I would become very familiar with towards the end of the same year when I discovered their Jurassic Park. I started reading that comic from #6 and by then two of the three titles below had already been cancelled and replaced by others, which probably shocked the publisher as much as the readers, given what they were based on.

On the back page is the same Aliens advert from last time promoting #9 of that comic and its brand new UK strip, the review of which will be up on 18th February 2025. For now Dracula slinks back into his coffin to await the next review of his own comic. This is the most promising movie adaptation yet on the blog, so let’s hope #3 continues the trend on Sunday 2nd March 2025.

iSSUE ONE < > iSSUE THREE

DRACULA MENU

BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA #1: DARK ARTS

The first new real time read through for 2025 adds a third title to the Dark Horse International menu on the blog with Bram Stoker’s Dracula from 1993. This was released in the same year as their Jurassic Park comic and follows a similar formula, the movie adaptation taking up all of the comic strip space inside and followed by some extra features. This is similar to the Alien³ Movie Special mini-series from the previous year and has the same description down the left-hand border.

However, much like Jurassic Park, this comic would continue beyond the end of the movie and become an ongoing monthly, albeit with a rather big caveat (which we’ll get to when the time comes). The atmospheric cover by Mike Mignola (Hellboy, Rocket Raccoon, Baltimore) cements the dark, gothic feel of the strip  and upon opening we’re met with a suitably black interior design.

I defy anyone who has seen the film not to read the introduction in Anthony Hopkins’ voice. I note that subscriptions are offered so clearly DHI were hoping the adaptation issues would be enough of a success for them to carry on. However, while it was advertised as a fortnightly in other comics it’s actually triweekly like the aforementioned adaptations.

Edited by Dick Hansom (Jurassic Park, Aliens, Speakeasy), the 36-page comic has a lovely glossy cover with matte interior pages, a 28-page first chapter and two two-page features at the rear. So far, so DHI. The real stand out here is the strip’s art. Regular readers will know how I feel about movie adaptations but to see an original art style filled me with confidence for this one.

The art goes the opposite way of the elaborate, ornate movie. It may have quite simply drawn scenes and characters, but it’s the use of shadow that ties it in so neatly to the film. There’s simply no way of capturing the intricacy of the design and the style of Francis Ford Coppola’s direction so instead it feels like penciller Mike, inker John Nyberg (Action Comics, Doom Patrol, Nexus) and colourist Mark Chiarello (Batman/Houdini, Hellboy, Hush) have gone for atmosphere over detail.

It works. It looks old-fashioned but I don’t mean in an ‘out-of-date comic’ kind of way. I mean the individual panels feel like they could’ve been drawn around the time the story is set and cleaned up for the 90s. Simple, sometimes scratchy line work with a mixture of bold colours for the more horrific scenes and subdued, almost washed out colours for the spookier moments, with the swathes of black in all the panels capturing that claustrophobic, haunted feel of the film, it’s just perfect.

John Costanza (Jurassic Park, The Tomb of Dracula, Red) does an incredible job on lettering Roy Thomas‘ (Conan, Secret Origins, Stoker’s Dracula) script too. Whether it’s historical prose, different handwriting (or typed text) for each character’s diary or his regular style, it’s all very clever and captures the narrative aspects of the film, as you can see above. The original US comic edited by story by Jim Salicrup (writer on Transformers, Sledge Hammer and The A-Team), credited here as story editor.

Sometimes, however, the use of shadow can make it difficult to work out sequences of events and once or twice I found myself perusing panels a few times to work out what was happening, and that’s with me having seen the film recently. Like most comics adaptations the main audience would’ve been those who’d seen the movie already rather than new readers. Even more so with this one, I feel.

I’ve criticised previous movie adaptations for rushing through their screenplays or for being poor copies of their big screen originals, but I’ve also praised those that took the time to properly adapt the story to a different medium. Bram Stoker’s Dracula falls into the latter category. While what’s written on the page is basically verbatim from the script, the art does a perfect job of taking the movie fan back into that world to enjoy it in a different way.

A perfect example of this is the moment when the carriage comes to pick up Jonathan Harker. In the film a massive set was built for this scene and it was full of highly detailed, creepy imagery. Here, all of that is stripped back. Instead, the sparse nature of the art and the use of shadow captures how that moment felt for the viewer. This brings the chill of the scene to the reader much better than any attempt to just copy it ever could have.

The shadow work brings another benefit too. Previous attempts at adapting a movie have had mixed results in portraying the actors. Most times there’s no attempt at all (and that may have been due to rights), other times they’ve tried so hard to capture their likeness they become stilted and expressionless. This team does something different. Through clever use of dark shadows the characters look enough like the actors without having too much detail, meaning they retain their expressiveness and, most importantly (and something Alien³ failed to do) their faces remain distinct from each other’s.

Not all of the film’s iconic visuals translate well to the page though, the best/worst example being Jonathan’s train journey. While that marvellous model shot couldn’t hope to be replicated on the page, the zooming in on the peacock’s feathers makes no sense here and Dracula’s eyes in the sky just look weird. These moments were great examples of the film’s iconic style but I can’t help thinking they’d have been best left out here, or at least have the Count’s eyes elaborated on to make more sense in this medium than the seemingly random panel below.

The first chapter of the story ends on that horrible/terrifying scene with the baby. Anyone who has seen the film will know exactly which moment I’m talking about! Then it’s quite jarring to come to white pages. I kind of wish they’d kept them black, but that may have made them hard on the eyes. As with the first five issues of Jurassic Park, Gary Gerani’s behind-the-scenes feature is in parts and begins with the original source material. I remember at the time some people complaining about what they thought were “changes” to the character (e.g. Dracula walking about outside), so thankfully that’s all put to rest here, confirming this film is the one that follows the book and portrays the character most accurately.

I’m usually one who likes to read opening credits and link the names listed to other films I’ve watched, but I was surprised to find out which family-friendly Steven Spielberg movie James V. Hart had written! Although, I do disagree with him on the best way to read Bram Stoker’s novel. If it’s your first time reading any novel it shouldn’t be the annotated version, or at the very least ignore the annotations until your second reading. They can be fascinating on second reads, but they interrupt the flow of the work and can also contain spoilers for later in the book.

Dave HughesBloodlines is the news feature of the comic, similar to his Motion Tracker pages in Aliens. With Bram Stoker’s Dracula still in the cinemas at the time of publication the comic was keeping us up to date with its takings so far. It would go on to rake in over four times that amount. Also truly placing the comic in the past is the description of Anthony LaPaglia (Without a Trace) as a new actor on the scene! But it’s surely another film release that will catch blog readers’ attentions.

Who knew that silly film would go on to be reincarnated as a hit TV show? A show I really enjoyed until (coincidentally) Dracula turned up. Treating him like an easily-slayed villain-of-the-week was annoying and I remember that season becoming too sombre and lacked the humour of previous years, so I stopped watching. But anyway, it’s another example of placing this comic in our own timelines.

The news pages also mention Malcolm X, another film of the same era that I must revisit sometime, and Anno Dracula, an alternate history novel by Kim Newman which sounds fascinating, although I admit even all these years later I’ve never heard of it. Upon doing a bit of research I found out that in Anno Dracula, the Count’s first wife is called ‘Elisabeta’, a name taken from this film. Also above, you’ll see the usual fun competition and address our comics and magazines like to do at the time.

Rounding off the issue on the inside back cover is this advert for a very 90s jacket tie-in The Master from Doctor Who would’ve liked, and on the back page is an advert for #9 of Aliens. Even though #8 was still to be released two days later, the next one had some exciting new additions and this was also used as a Next Issue page in the Aliens comic itself.

It’s never going to tell the story as well as the film for newbies but this comic was clearly aimed at those who had just enjoyed Bram Stoker’s Dracula at the cinema. In that regard this is the best movie adaptation I’ve come across so far on the blog. That art, that brave decision to create its own unusual style that somehow feels just right, is wonderful. There’ll hopefully be for wonderfulness in just three weeks with #2 on Sunday 9th February 2025.

GO TO iSSUE TWO

DRACULA MENU